Latter-day Cipher by Latayne C. Scott

“I have administered the mercy of the atonement of blood.  The price has been paid.” (p. 76)

“Cumorah must be opened, purified by fire.” (p. 336)

Such are the words of a madman in Latayne C. Scott’s new novel Latter-day Cipher.  The premise of the book:  What if someone chose to live the original teachings of Mormonism today?

I first heard about this story when Latayne wrote a guest post on a blog I frequent, Mormon Coffee, which is kept up by Mormonism Research Ministry.  As someone who has enjoyed reading and learning more over the years about Mormonism and comparing it to true biblical Christianity, this was a book that immediately grabbed my interest.  It contained several elements that I enjoy very much:  Mormonism vs. Christianity, murder mystery, and suspense.  I was not disappointed.

In the book we follow newspaper reporter Selonnah Zee from her home in Tennessee to a vacation in Salt Lake City, where she visits her cousin, Roger, his wife, Eliza, and their daughter, Maria.  Roger had converted to Mormonism after moving to Utah and had just been hired as a spokesman for the Church.  Just before leaving for her trip, however, Selonnah’s boss calls with some interesting news:  the Mormons are building a temple nearby, and it would be nice if Selonnah could find as much information as possible about Mormon temples during her trip for a story when she returns.

Around the time Selonnah goes to Utah, a series of unusual crimes begins taking place.  First a young woman who has turned her back on Mormonism is found brutally murdered in Provo Canyon.  Next the body of a Salt Lake City prostitute is discovered naked downtown, and the state in which she is found is disturbingly poetic in light of the clues left behind.  As additional crimes continue, the bizarre nature of all of them seems to raise several questions that can only be answered in Utah:  What is the meaning behind these unusual breaches of the law?  What is the point behind the notes that are being left at the site of each crime in a strange alphabet?  Most importantly, do Mormon history and doctrine hold the answers?

In the midst of everything, Roger’s wife Eliza is starting to question the Church in which she grew up.  Many of the doctrines in which Eliza has believed her whole life now seem to be crumbling around her.  Are the American Indians really descendants of Ancient Israel?  Is the Book of Abraham an accurate translation of the Egyptian papyri bought by Joseph Smith?  Is God really just an exalted man with a body like ours?

Selonnah finds herself discovering the same information as Eliza through a local Christian and fellow news reporter, Anne, and the help of two Salt Lake City police officers, Lt. Luke Taylor and Police Chief Helaman Peterson.  As Selonnah goes beyond the façade created by the LDS Church’s public relations department, she is increasingly disturbed by what she finds.  Only a search into the depths of a religion in which 13 million people have placed their faith will reveal the answers.

I feel that Latayne presented LDS doctrine and history especially well in Latter-day Cipher, all while putting it into an exciting story for those who prefer a novel over non-fiction.  There are many quotes throughout the book that define the message of the story, but I think one that sums it all up for me is made by Eliza when explaining her reservations about Mormonism to Roger:

I want the great I AM who spoke to Moses out of the burning bush.  Not the Getting There Ahead of You on the Road.  Maybe I want to believe in a swashbuckling God….  I want a Rescuer who’s always been a Rescuer.  A God who’s always been a God.  I don’t want to depend on a fabrication of a johnny-come-lately wannabe.  I don’t want the human in a fantasy witness protection program who has an invented history—a representation, if you will—that happens to intersect at a few places across the Bible with that fierce-eyebrowed, no-nonsense, Love Incarnate God.  The One who’s always been around.  Like eternally around. (p. 272)

In this quote, Eliza perfectly describes the God that I want to know as well.  Do I want to know a god who’s simply a super-human?  Not at all!

22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
-Romans 1:22-23, KJV

Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God.
-Psalm 90:2

Like Eliza, this is the God I’ll take…not one who’s just on the road of progression ahead of me, but the One who’s always been the Destination, who teaches and guides me because He already knows all and loves me.  In the wonderful words of Joshua 24:15, “but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”

Small Observation from Lehi’s Vision

I was just reading over the Presidents of the Church Sunday School manual for Mormons who are 12-13 years old.  I read through lesson 2, titled “The Scriptures-A Sure Guide for the Latter Days.”  The lesson focuses on the Book of Mormon story of Lehi’s vision in 1 Nephi 8 and its interpretation in chapter 11.  The lesson points out that in 1 Nephi 11.25, the tree in Lehi’s dream represents the love of God.  Although it’s not mentioned in the lesson, when I went back and examined all the passages referenced in the lesson, I found this verse makes the tree synonymous in symbolism with the fountain of living waters.  This was a red flag for me because of the fact that in the next chapter of the Book of Mormon, Nephi is informed in verse 16 that the fountain is filthy!

Once again, this truly must be a different god than that of the Bible.  Although fountains aren’t often mentioned in the Bible, we see in Revelation 22.1 that God’s fountain is as pure as can be:  ”And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.”
Not only is the fountain filthy, but “the depths thereof are the depths of hell.” (12.16)  The love of God is the depths of hell?  Absolutely not!  Jesus gives us living water! (see John 4.10)
These are just brief observations, but significant!

Welcome to 2009!

I would just like to wish everyone a Happy New Year and hope that the Lord blesses you throughout 2009!

Have any of you made New Years resolutions?  I made a few for this year.  I wrote them in my journal after the ball dropped.  They are:

1.  Spread my ministry to Mormons so that more will come to hear and accept the message of the true Jesus of the Bible, and reject the false Jesus taught by Joseph Smith and his successors.  I plan on doing this by continually reading through the Triple Combination (Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price) and also studying what the Mormons are studying in church this year (Doctrine and Covenants and Church History and Presidents of the Church) and comparing what I find with what the Bible teaches.  I will also write about it on my blog and, when I’m able, share my findings with Mormons.  I’m also teaching a short class in March at church on Mormonism, so I’m informing other Christians about it as well.
2.  Read through the entire English Standard Version of the Bible.
3.  I just recently started exercising again, so in order to maintain the temple the Lord has given me (see 1 Corinthians 3.16-17), I plan on sticking with it all year.
4.  Although I already stated this somewhat already, I do not wish to limit sharing my faith to Mormons, as all people need to hear the Gospel, not just Latter-day Saints.  My theme passage from the Bible this year is, therefore, Matthew 28.19-20:  ”Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” (NASB)

Do you have any New Years resolutions?  Please feel free to share!

1 Nephi 5-19

I really didn’t find much of interest to me in 1 Nephi 5.  Overall, this chapter of the Book of Mormon just seems to be telling more of the story, and I really don’t see any kind of doctrine that would be out of line with either the Bible or Mormon theology.  In that case, I’ll leave it alone.  If I find something later, maybe I’ll come back to it, but I’m not going to bother with things that I don’t have a problem with.
I had one small issue with chapter 6, however.  In verse 3, Nephi points out the fact that he’s running out of room for writing and he desires to focus on the things of God.  If his space is so limited, however, why is he later able to copy 17 chapters from the Book of Isaiah in the Bible into his book?  1 Nephi 20-21 and 2 Nephi 7-8, 12-24, and 27 are all almost word-for-word copies of entire chapters of Isaiah in the King James Version.  Why did he have to copy these on such limited space if his people already had the words of Isaiah?  Couldn’t they have been contained in other copies of the scriptures rather than repeated in a place where Nephi wished to use his limited space to share what the Lord had imparted to him?
My next observation was in chapter 7, where in verses 1-2, we find the “Lord” speaking to Lehi again and telling him to send Nephi and his brothers back to Jerusalem to get Ishmael and his family so that Nephi and his brethren can take the Ishmaelite women as wives.  Forgive me for being too picky, but I guess that to a Christian who believes in an all-knowing (omniscient) God, this one keeps forgetting the details.  He has to send Nephi and his brothers back to Jerusalem twice for things forgotten:  first for the plates that were being kept by Laban which contained the family genealogy, and this time, basically, for women so the men could marry.  Psalm 147.5 tells us:  ”Great is our Lord, and of great power:  his understanding is inifinite.” (italics mine)  Likewise, Jesus’ disciples declared of Him,  ”Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee:  by this we believe that thou camest forth from God.” (John 16.30)  We find further confirmation of this in Colossians 2.2-3, and even other Mormon scriptures testify that God knows everything (see 2 Nephi 2.24; 9.20; Words of Mormon 1.7; Alma 26.35; Mormon 8.17; Moroni 7.22; Doctrine and Covenants 38.1-2; 88.6, 41; Moses 1.6; etc.)  Once again, it seems that the god guiding Nephi is neither the God of Christianity, nor the god of Mormonism, which begs the question:  who is this god?
My next two observations come in chapter 12.  I first noticed verse 9, which says:  ”And he said unto me:  Thou rememberest the twelve apostles of the Lamb?  Behold they are they who shall judge the twelve tribes of Israel; wherefore, the twelve ministers of thy seed shall be judged of them; for ye are of the house of Israel.”    When I look at the footnotes in the 1981 edition of the Book of Mormon, I see that this is supposed to be between 600 and 592 B.C.  If this supposedly happened around 600 years before Christ ever lived on Earth, how is Nephi to remember the twelve apostles, whom Christ brought about?
Another problem in chapter 12 is found in verse 16, where the angel who is speaking to Nephi tells Nephi to “[b]ehold the fountain of filthy water which [his] father saw….”  This is just a minor observation really, but if Lehi went to the trouble to put all the detail he did into the retelling of his dream, why did he leave out the fact that the fountain was filthy, especially when it bears such great significance in the meaning of the vision?  If we go back and read Lehi’s account to Nephi in chapter 8, there is absolutely no mention whatsoever of the fountain being filthy.
Next we come to chapter 13, where Nephi is having a vision, and this vision is of a church set up on the earth “which is most abominable above all other churches….” (v. 5) which bears a remarkeable resemblance in the description Nephi gives to the Roman Catholic Church (vv. 4-9, 25-29, 32, 34).  Mixed in are some other thoughts, one of which I found to be very interesting.  Verse 15 is in a part of Nephi’s vision in which he sees the “Lord’s” true church being established on the earth, and he says, “And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain.”  I must admit, I find this verse to be shocking!  How can Mormons hold to this passage of the Book of Mormon and still claim that they do not believe in racism?  No where in the Bible do we find any similar teachings which would confirm that God’s people have a certain skin color which is more beautiful than another!  Instead, we find just the opposite.  Romans 10.12 says:  ”For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek:  for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.”  Likewise, Galatians 3.28 says, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female:  for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”  There is no room for racism in the true Gospel of Jesus.  There is, however, plenty of room for anyone who will come unto Him!  Once again, we see ample evidence that the god of the Book of Mormon is not the God of the Bible!
If we continue on in this chapter, we come back to some more discussion of the great and abominable church I already mentioned, but this one adds a little bit more to the first part:  apostasy.  It “foretells” the Great Apostasy on which the whole claim of Mormonism builds its foundation.  Verses 26-29, 32, and 34 tell us about how the great and abominable church will take many plain and precious truths and, basically, drive them out of the rest of the earth.  While this is a very important claim for the LDS Church to maintain if it wishes to maintain its membership, it’s also clear that other scripture, whether Christian or Mormon, actually denies it.  Jesus Himself says in Matthew 16.18:  ”And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (italics mine)  He also tells us in Matthew 5.18:  ”For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”  Further, we find Mormon scripture contradicting itself once again.  In 3 Nephi 28.4-9, we see the Jesus of Mormonism promising three Nephites that they will never taste of death until he returns, and in Doctrine and Covenants 7.1-3, we find Joseph Smith having a “revelation” telling him that John the Revelator was promised the same thing.  If this is so, there could never have been a total apostasy on the earth from Christ’s true church.  After all, we see in v. 9 of the passage in 3 Nephi that the whole reason the Nephites wanted to stay behind was “for [they] have desired that [they] might bring the souls of men unto [him]….”  How can there be a total apostasy when Jesus has three missionaries left on the earth at all times, no matter what, until his return?  It doesn’t make sense.  Further teaching on this in the Bible is found in Psalm 33.11 and Matthew 24.35; more LDS Scripture that teaches this doctrine is found in 2 Nephi 9.16; Doctrine and Covenants 1.38; and Joseph Smith-Matthew 1.35.  These passages all clearly blow the doctrine of a total apostasy right out of the water.
I next had a couple one-word observations in chapter 16.  The first came in verse 13, where a place is referred to as “Shazer.”  I looked at the footnote, and it points out that the word is Hebrew for “twisting, intertwining.”  Curious as to how accurate this was, I did an Internet search for the word “Shazer,” and found that there are no instances of such a place known outside the Book of Mormon.  If this is the only instance of the word that is found, how do we know that it’s Hebrew or what it could possibly mean?  The simple fact of the matter is, we don’t.  This is just another case of the LDS leadership trying desperately to find external corroboration for the Book of Mormon which simply isn’t there.
On the same note, verse 34 of the same chapter mentions a place called “Nahom.”  Once again, there’s no concrete evidence that such a place exists.  In addition to that, the footnote of the LDS edition of the Book of Mormon points out that it’s “Hebrew” and “probably ‘consolation,’ from verb naham, ‘be sorry, console onseself’.”  The presence of the word “probably” in the footnote only confirms that whoever wrote these footnotes is only speculating, as none of the so-called “historical” events or places of the Book of Mormon can be verified externally.
My next point comes in chapter 17, where Nephi points out the biblical story of the Israelites who had rebelled against God in Numbers 21.4-9.  I find his account of the story very interesting since in verse 41 Nephi says that, “He sent fiery flying serpents among them….”  After going back and reading the passage in Numbers again, I’m having trouble figuring out where is was Nephi learned that the serpents were flying?  I have to admit, if they were, this would have probably become the topic of a pretty bad B-movie by now that people just sit at home and watch, laughing hysterically…right up there with The Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.  Indeed, for a great prophet of God chosen to succeed his father, Nephi really doesn’t seem to grasp hold of the details of the scriptures very well.
Next we come upon chapter 18 of a prophet who doesn’t have a great track record so far, and we see Nephi showing his ignorance of yet another doctrine of the Mormon gospel…and this one’s huge:  it pertains to the eternal salvation of mankind.  Finally, Nephi and his family are all on a ship to head to what is now considered part of the Americas.  The word “Americas” isn’t used, but it’s well known today that this is where the story takes us, and while sailing across the ocean, Lehi and Sariah, now getting very old, are so upset by the disobedience of their two oldest sons, Laman and Lemuel, that their old bodies just can’t handle it anymore.  Nephi points out that “they were brought near even to be carried out of this time to meet their God; yea, their grey hairs were about to be brought down to lie low in the dust; yea, even they were near to be cast with sorrow into a watery grave.” (v. 18)  Most would look at this and say What’s wrong with that?  We die and we go to meet God! and I would agree with them (so long as “we” is referring to Christians).  Mormon theology does not, however, agree with the point made in this passage.  According to the theology of the LDS Church, our spirits go to the spirit world after death, not to meet God, so how could Nephi possibly think that’s where his parents were going?  In Doctrine and Covenants 138, Joseph F. Smith, 6th President, Prophet, Seer, and Revelator of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, points out in verses 11-24 and 53-60 that the dead go on to a spirit world after their life on earth.  He points out that after his death, Christ went to minister to the spirits who were righteous and set them free from the bondage of their sins.  After this, the righteous spirits were sent to spirit prison, where those were not righteous during their lives were being held.  The spirits of the righteous started teaching the Gospel to the spirits in prison, and those who accept the message are released from spirit prison and allowed to join the spirits of the righteous after a faithful living Mormon is baptized by proxy on behalf of those in spirit prison in and LDS temple.  Only once Christ has come back and the final judgment is made will anyone ever go to meet God, and this will only be those who have done all they can since joining the LDS Church, thus attaining the Celestial Kingdom of Heaven (see Doctrine and Covenants 76.92-96).  If this is truly what happens to the dead when they die, how could Nephi not have known?  Also, for those who are Christians reading this blog, please take note that I know “Nephi’s” conjecture agrees more with the Bible than does the Doctrine and Covenants, but I will touch more on the issues within the Doctrine and Covenants when I get to it.
My last point (whew!) is in chapter 19.  My issue with this chapter comes in verse 2, where Nephi points out that the family genealogy is held in the plates his father wrote on, and therefore he chose not to include them in his own record.  I first find myself questioning what led Nephi to take so much time in copying the words of Isaiah if they were already written down if that was the attitude he took with the genealogy his father copies, but that is a minor question in light of the other I have to ask, and this question takes some explaining.
One reading the Book of Mormon for the first time might be reading this and asking what book of Nephi’s father I’m talking about, as there’s no book of Lehi in the Book of Mormon.  Mormons are generally very familiar with the story, but those who are new to the movement don’t necessarily know.  When Joseph Smith supposedly had the golden plates and was translating them, he used three scribes:  1) his main wife, Emma (and at the time his only wife), 2) Martin Harris, and 3) Oliver Cowdery.  Joseph’s method of translating the book, according to official Church-sanctioned literature (although it can be countered in many points), is that Joseph stood separated from his scribe in some way or another and would read the translation from the plates by the assistance of the “Urim and Thummim,” a pair of glasses he found with the plates which showed him the English version of what he was reading in “Reformed Egyptian.”  During the time that Martin Harris was working as Joseph’s scribe, Martin was having issues with his wife, as she wouldn’t believe the work Joseph was doing was genuine.  In an effort to prove to his wife that the work was real, therefore, Harris asked Joseph Smith to allow him to take the first 116 pages of the manuscript, known as the “Book of Lehi,” home to his wife.  Joseph inquired of the “Lord” three times whether or not this was okay.  The first two times Martin was told no, but finally “God” allowed it.  The first 116 pages of the Book of Mormon haven’t been seen since, and thus we have no Book of Lehi (this story is found in Joseph Smith’s History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, vol. 1, pp. 20-21.)  Joseph Smith later received a “revelation” telling him that he must not go back and retranslate the Book of Lehi, as those who possessed the manuscript he had already made were making alterations to it so that once he introduced the Book of Mormon, they could compare the first manuscript with his new one and show discrepancies which they had created (this “revelation” is now Doctrine and Covenants 10), which brings me back to 1 Nephi 19.2.
So let me make sure I understand this:  ”God” tells Nephi to go back to Jerusalem, kill a man in cold blood, and take back the family genealogy (1 Nephi 3-4), so Martin Harris can lose the genealogy 2200 years later and it will serve the Church on the earth absolutely no purpose whatsoever?  Once again, what kind of omniscient god is this?  It may make sense to many, but I think I’ll stick to the God of the Bible, who doesn’t ask me to disobey Him in order to obey Him, and a God who doesn’t have us murder others just to retrieve scriptures that will serve no purpose.
Well, I hope that’s enough for you because I’m finally done with this post!  Please share any thoughts you may have with me on it.  If you’re not Mormon, my prayer is that this will at least help you learn more about Mormonism and be informed about what they believe.  If you are Mormon, please also feel free to contact and share your thoughts with me.  I only ask that you do so respectfully, as I have made every effort to be respectful myself.  If you perceive any way in which I have been disrespectful toward Mormons here, please feel free to point it out to me, as insulting is the last thing I ever wish to do.  Plus, whether you’re Mormon or not, if you would like to talk more to me about what it means to pursue a relationship with the true Jesus of the Bible, the one and only true living Christ, please feel free to contact me about that as well.  You may leave a comment here, or e-mail me at tommys.testimony@yahoo.com.  God bless, and Happy New Year!

1 Nephi 3-4

Obviously, as one can see from the date, it’s been a while since I last posted, so I’ve got quite a few thoughts to share from the last time I posted.

My first thought comes along in 1 Nephi 4, but for the context of what is happening, one must go back and read the contents of chapter 3 as well.  According to the passage, Lehi and his family have now left Jerusalem and are en route to the Americas (although they aren’t specifically labeled as the “Americas,” it’s just common knowledge that this is where the story takes us).  In chapter 3, Lehi tells Nephi about a dream he had, commanding Lehi to send Nephi and his brothers back to Jerusalem to retrieve the family genealogy from Lehi’s brother Laban (vv. 2-8).  Nephi and his brothers depart and as they begin to approach Jerusalem, we come upon chapter 4.  In verse 3, Nephi recounts to his brothers the instance where an angel had appeared to them (3.29-30) and makes the comment:  ”and ye also know that an angel hath spoken unto you; wherefore can ye doubt?”
This is where I came upon my first issue with the passage.  Certainly we can trust angels when they bring us messages from the Lord.  After all, how else would Joseph have known that Mary was still trustworthy and had been faithful to him, even though she was now pregnant and he knew there was no possible way he could be the father (see Matthew 1.18-25)?  I don’t doubt that angels sometimes speak to us on God’s behalf.  What I find somewhat unusual about Nephi’s angel is that he gave Nephi no way of knowing whether or not this message was from God.  We learn in 2 Corinthians 11.14:  ”And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”  If Satan can be transformed into an angel of light, how are we to know whether or not we can trust what an angel says to us?  I say the best idea is probably to follow the example of the church in Berea.  The Bible tells us:  ”These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (2 Corinthians 17.11; italics mine)  We certainly see that Joseph knew what the angel said was true because the angel pointed out to him the prophecy from the scriptures which was being fulfilled. (Matthew 1.22-23, referencing Isaiah 7.14)  I see no evidence of Nephi receiving any such confirmation.  He simply assumes the message is from God because he saw an angel.  Such a problem certainly brings into question whether or not this truly is a message from God, and considering what Nephi is told next, I’d say absolutely not.
A few verses later we find what I think is one of the most shocking points I have found in my studies of Mormonism so far.  In 1 Nephi 4.10-14, God commands Nephi to murder his uncle!  Right there in one of the very first chapters of the Book of Mormon, it becomes clear that whoever accepts this book cannot simultaneously believe in the Bible, which teaches very clearly in Exodus 20.13, “Thou shalt not kill.”  It’s that simple!  The exact same words are even copied down later in the Book of Mormon.  Mosiah 13 repeats the Ten Commandments, but the fact that these contradictory messages are found in the book makes one wonder how an all-knowing god could overlook such discrepancies in his own teaching?  We’re commanded not to kill but special exceptions were made for Nephi?  It doesn’t add up.
My next point came from a book I have titled The Christian Companion to the Triple Combination, and to any Christian wishing to study Mormonism’s scriptures, I highly recommend it.  This book occasionally gives me insights into the Book of Mormon I never would have otherwise had, and such is the case with 1 Nephi 4.19-21.  In these verses, after Nephi has “obeyed the Lord’s command” of beheading his uncle, he puts on Laban’s clothing in order to fool Laban’s servant, which will make it so he can get into Laban’s treasury.  So let me make sure I’m understanding this correctly:  Nephi beheads his uncle upon the command of God, which would have doubtlessly covered Laban’s clothing in blood, and then he puts the clothing on which fools Laban’s servant into believing Nephi is Laban so that the servant lets Nephi into the treasury where he is able to take the family genealogy?  Does no one else see the issues with this passage?  I have to admit, if someone walked up to me in my boss’s blood-soaked clothing claiming to be him, I might just think something funny is going on.

I was originally planning on entering more than this, but I think this is enough for now, so I’ll go ahead and leave off here.  Hopefully I’ll pick up more soon!

Starting the Book of Mormon

Title Page – 1 Nephi 2

I just recently started reading the Book of Mormon.  I’m taking notes in my quad as I go along.  I made the decision a few days ago to read through the triple combination in the next year, and I decided I would take notes on things I find interesting.  I’m doing this for a couple reasons:  1) I love Mormons and want to be prepared to share the truth with them, which means being informed about what they believe, and 2) they won’t be able to ask me how I can be sure the Book of Mormon is false if I haven’t even read it.  I don’t believe reading a book is an accurate way of knowing whether or not it’s true, but since Mormons seem to think this is so important, I’ll go ahead and read it.  I started a couple nights ago to get ahead (since my schedule doesn’t actually start until 1 January anyway), and we’ll see how well it goes!  I will record my thoughts here as I go along.  I’m going to do my best to be fair and not criticize something just because it’s what Mormons believe.  Hopefully with the Lord’s help, I will accomplish that in a loving and Christ-like manner!

My first night I read the title page of the Book of Mormon through 1 Nephi 2.  I made a couple observations.

The first observation was on the title page.  On that page, there is a line speaking of the gold plates from which the Book of Mormon supposedly came.  It says that it is a record “Written and sealed up, and hid up unto the Lord, that they might not be destroyed.”  I have to admit I’m curious.  If the Book of Mormon was written and sealed up unto the Lord so that it might not be destroyed, why didn’t the Lord take the same efforts to protect the Bible?  Mormons only believe the Bible “as far as it is translated correctly….” (Eighth Article of Faith)  While I disagree that there is any error in the Bible, it begs the question of one who does believe why God would go to such lengths to protect one portion of His scripture, but the other portion He will just sit back and watch as it falls into corruption and its manuscripts deteriorate?  Does God care more about the Book of Mormon and its accuracy than that of the Bible?  In addition to that, how are we to know the Book of Mormon is more accurate than the Bible?  After all, we can’t examine the plates to see if they are translated correctly, so how are we to know that it’s been protected so well?

My second note in the Book of Mormon was simply a point I already knew about, but made sure to note.  The second paragraph of the Introduction explains that the Book of Mormon gives an account of three separate civilizations called the Nephites, Lamanites, and Jaredites, all descended from the ancient Israelites.  It tells us that they were the ancient inhabitants of the Americas, and the last line informs us that “they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians.”  If this is true, why did a Doubleday edition of the Book of Mormon, which was printed in 2006 and closely monitored by the LDS Church, change the last line to read “they are among the ancestors of the American Indians?”  I’ve also read in news articles that this change is expected in the LDS edition of the Book of Mormon, although when is not known for sure.  It seems that the leadership of the LDS Church is acknowledging as quietly as possible the DNA evidence found which shows that the American Indians are primarily descendants of Asia.  No drop of Hebrew blood has been found in any of the thousands tested so far!  As the Church continues to concede its doctrine to the findings of the day, one must wonder how dependable the prophets and apostles who lead this Church truly are.  It seems clear that the prophets spoken of are the false prophets mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:21-22:

21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.

My last thought while looking at the Book of Mormon was in the Testimony of the Three Witnesses.  The testimony concludes with the statement:  “And the honor be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God.  Amen.”  This statement sounds very much like Christian doctrine to me, but it leaves one wondering how this testimony can be valid if one is to believe the teachings of Joseph Smith and other Mormon leaders!  Joseph Smith said:

“The teachers of the day say that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God, and they are all in one body and one God.  Jesus prayed that those that the Father had given him out of the world might be made one in them, as they were one [one in spirit, in mind, in purpose].  If I were were to testify that the Christian world were wrong on this point, my testimony would be true.” -Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 322

“I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit:  and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods.  If this is in accordance with the New Testament, lo and behold! we have three Gods anyhow, and they are plural; and who can contradict it?” – Ibid., pp. 383-4

Likewise, Mormon apostle Bruce R. McConkie teaches in his book Mormon Doctrine (pp. 576-7):

“Three separate personages–Father, Son, and Holy Ghost–comprise the Godhead.  As each of these persons is a God, it is evident, from this standpoint alone, that a plurality of Gods exists.  To us, speaking in the proper finite sense, these three are the only Gods we worship.”

It seems to me that Mormonism today doesn’t agree all that much with the doctrine the Three Witnesses believed in when it comes to God!

My Testimony

If you wish to know more about me (Tommy) and why I’m interested in creating a blog on Mormonism, please feel free to read my testimony, found here.